Oh snap: Maxim scores 50 Cent 2 higher than Killzone 2, SFIV
Ladies and gentlemen, girls and boys, Maxim has dropped knowledge upon us. Read this, know this, feel it in your bones: 50 Cent: Blood on the Sand has been scored higher than both Killzone 2 and Street Fighter IV. This comes as GameTrailers member G00se has posted scans of the latest issue, in which 50 Cent is given a 4/5, Killzone 2 a 3.5/5 and Street Fighter IV a 3/5. Maxim calls 50 Cent "a wanksta proof gem," noting its new Fiddy songs, co-op play and "a story that is Indiana Jones meets Scarface." Killzone 2 -- which the magazine refers to as Kill Zone 2 -- is labeled "the hottest girl at the ball, if not quite the best dancer." And SFIV? Maxim notes that "it takes the series to 3D" -- even though that actually happened ages ago -- but "loses a fistful of its old-school soul."We can't think of any possible way to expand upon this. No, really, that's all we got.
[Via PS3 Fanboy]










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
slipknot0129 @ Jan 20th 2009 2:22PM
I knew killzone 2 would suck.
ANTCEP @ Jan 20th 2009 2:36PM
Translation:
killzone 2 looked promising and i was jealous but on the review of a lads mag i am happy because im a fanboy
DemonGSides @ Jan 20th 2009 3:11PM
Also: a joke.
GregA @ Jan 20th 2009 4:05PM
Yeah... I realize you are a troll, but still I tend to agree. From all the videos I have seen KZ2 looks like it offers absolutely nothing to the FPS genra except for pretty graphics. Far Cry 2 had very pretty graphics but that game sucked as well. (and Crysis IMO)
On top of it, from the spoiler movies I have seen, the game seems to be a retelling of the first Iraq war from a pro-bushie stance. Sony games seem really big on the stupid stories. I don't care about the melodrama. I play FPS for the head shots, although grenade sticks were a happy diversion;)
Add in another red flag that I see in games a lot... long development time with lots of delays, those games always seem to be disappointments.
Finally, I could ignore all those issues for great FPS, but it is on PS3... So the whole thing is going to be a quiet experience.
And WTF??? No co-op??? In 2009 a game is gonna be released without co-op? Are you kidding me?
Soooo... looking at Maxims demographic it is quite possible that 50 cent will be a better game to their readers than KZ2 which looks over the top nerdy and lacking anything that will make it stand out.
McManus @ Jan 20th 2009 8:00PM
honestly i think KZ2 looks like a good game with something nothing except COD: Modern Warfare 2 will have
Mazrael @ Jan 20th 2009 2:21PM
..riiight.... :s
Bravo6 @ Jan 20th 2009 2:25PM
You can find me in the club, bottle full of bub
Jon @ Jan 21st 2009 7:45AM
I don't care its not your Birthday
devilsoultaker @ Jan 20th 2009 2:27PM
LMAO
loool Ps3 fanboys gonna be MAD
Van Faulk @ Jan 20th 2009 2:30PM
They are always mad.
Dan @ Jan 20th 2009 2:41PM
Yeah, a review from a Maxim Magazine is real credible :/ Idiots. You give 360 fanboys a bad name. When IGN or Gametrailers gives it a bad review, then say "I knew it."
goliathsdkfz @ Jan 21st 2009 9:27AM
@dan
Ign and the like review anything good. There hardly credible.
ANTCEP @ Jan 20th 2009 2:30PM
so maxim have chimps writing for them now?
Jonman @ Jan 20th 2009 2:47PM
You mean that they had non-chimps writing for them at some point?
The Sawyer family @ Jan 20th 2009 3:01PM
chimpin ain't EZ
iamnotafish @ Jan 20th 2009 3:06PM
but its necessary ... i'm chasing bananas like tom chases jerry ...
Trickob @ Jan 20th 2009 3:12PM
@Sawyer
+50 (fiddy)! You win King of the Internet for today.
As for the article, perhaps, when it says that 50 cent's game is "Indiana Jones meets Scarface," perhaps they are referring to the games??
NineT9 @ Jan 20th 2009 6:05PM
@The Sawyer family, wow effing hilarious bud! just had to come in here and say that :)
and about the topic...come on, MAXIM review of Killzone? No ones going to believe that crap
Mr. Mosin @ Jan 21st 2009 3:55PM
@Sawyer:
I elled oh el.
@Maxim:
I elled oh el.
Rick @ Jan 20th 2009 2:34PM
Who the hell even reads Maxim?
joeybeast @ Jan 20th 2009 2:43PM
I didn't even know they have game reviews.
xenocidic @ Jan 20th 2009 2:52PM
I read it for the pictures.
ZhiZeng @ Jan 20th 2009 3:00PM
I used to read it way back when it didn't suck. I still have my first issue from June 1996.
Latin Trident @ Jan 20th 2009 6:36PM
did you know that maxim is coming out with a "blind section"? they are putting braille on the models and blind people can read the image! fantastic!
francisco @ Jan 20th 2009 2:36PM
This is funny. First 50 cent game sucked. No way I would choose this game over SFIV. MAXIM magazine aren't gamers what do they know?? lol
erivera3 @ Jan 20th 2009 2:36PM
A PS3 game is touted for its visual flare with little regard for gameplay or story? I don't believe it.
Dan @ Jan 20th 2009 2:43PM
A fanboy that thinks a review from this type of magazine is credible? What a shocker!
Alex @ Jan 20th 2009 2:55PM
A fanboy who is in disguise on a X360 blog imposing on our fantastic, very believable reviews?
Who'd have thunk it.
stukorn @ Jan 20th 2009 2:39PM
I hate when these shit men magazines try to review games, it's just embaressing!
Dan @ Jan 20th 2009 2:39PM
Are you guys idiots? Do you even know what kind of Maxim magazine is? If you think KZ2 is going to suck because of a review from this kind of magazine, then you're not the type of Xbox360 fanboy that should be on this site.
vidGuy @ Jan 20th 2009 2:44PM
Whooosh!
That's the sound of this post going way, way over your head.
Mal F4cti0n @ Jan 21st 2009 12:20AM
Dude....it's news, that's all. Nothing in the post says that they, or we, believe what Maxim says.
Relax, that's the score Maxim gave it. We here find amusement in that as much as if it were posted on the PS3fanboy site. Some may laugh and think that says something about the game and others may laugh because it says something about the magazine.
Your an idiot if you have to come here to post and ask "are you guys idiots".
Digitalspirit @ Jan 20th 2009 2:41PM
Is Killzone 2 actually any good? They are all creaming over it and I was seriously thinking of getting the bundle, but now I'm not so sure, the graphics are awesome, but I've read the controls are not very good and the multiplayer isn't cracked up to be as good as the game hype. Halo 3 may be a far cry away graphically, but the gameplay has always been superb. Maybe I should stay faithful to the 360, I'm still on the fence though tbh.
Dan @ Jan 20th 2009 2:46PM
No official review is allowed to be released yet.
Digitalspirit @ Jan 20th 2009 2:49PM
I've seen the ones on Metacritic, but some guys from 1up who played it really bitched about the controls and I hate the PS3 pad as it is, but I'm a diehard FPS fan, hence my interest.
Dan @ Jan 20th 2009 3:00PM
I was in the BETA for it a few months back. I used to have no interest in this game. It was always L4D, H3, GoW2, Fable 2, and CoD4 for me. I do have quite a few great PS3 exclusives, but I do prefer the 360. After playing the Beta for KZ2, I know this is going to be one of the biggest shooters for 09. I can see the best FPS award for 09 being fought between KZ2 and CoDMW2. The guys at 1UP are being overly dramatic. Are the controls ackward at times, yes, but the controls adjust well surprisingly, plus I hear there is this device that can make it so you can play a PS3 game with a 360 controller. It's worth the money, trust me. Besides, you can always sell.
ryuk @ Jan 20th 2009 3:11PM
get it, trust me, it's way worth it, you will not regret it, and if you do i'll give you my address so you can send me a dog turd or something, this is coming from a PS3 and 360 owner, they are both terrific, they both have great games, though i play gears and halo on PC, and the PSN is just as great as xbox live, however i think the PS3's XMB is way easier and way more organized, but i think that NXE's avatars are slightly better than home, but the minigames and stuff in home are fun
Neuromancer @ Jan 20th 2009 5:34PM
I think it'll be good. The 1st was a solid game, and I think they'll improve on a lot. Biggest downside is no achievements. =(
Destroyer88 @ Jan 20th 2009 2:42PM
Take it from a guy who has a stack of Maxim's sitting right next to him, these guys don't know anything about anything other than how to airbrush Hollywood's hottest hoes to make them seem half attractive.
They butcher any sport they talk about, give bad game reviews, feature horrible cars, talk about crappy music....what else am I missing? I've gotten every issue for the past few years for free and while their articles CAN be funny, most of the time they have no idea what they are talking about.
danny. @ Jan 20th 2009 3:13PM
They recently did a feature on the 99 best beers in the world.
Let's just say Colt 45 made the list (as best of the bottom shelf) and great beers from Ska, Left Hand, Flying Dog, Urthel (at left), Unibroue, Delirium, etc. didn't... (sorry, it's not hard to think of beers better than Colt 45).
One more thing... Hamm's wins a Great American Beer Fest award and they don't make the 'best of the bottom shelf'?
on topic:
All this Killzone 2 talk is pointless when the real error is the slap in the face to street fighter.
ryuk @ Jan 20th 2009 3:18PM
@danny: yeah, i played the acrade version of SFIV, and it was great, it played exactly like you would expect street fighter would, the combos are really inuitive, and it's just overall great
Deck @ Jan 20th 2009 2:43PM
Hahaha. Wow. Well I hope everyone takes "Maxim's" review with a grain of salt. Seriously. I don't know what Killzone 2 is going to be like... but any outlet who puts a 50 Cent game over that and SFIV... man, I just don't know what to say.
ryuk @ Jan 20th 2009 2:59PM
actually, a lot of official reviews have been released it got :
official PS magazin: 10/10
OPM: 10/10
megamer:9.9/10
official PS magazine (uk):9/10
....yeah, are you guys really gonna listen to maxim for a game review
ryuk @ Jan 20th 2009 3:02PM
oh, one more thing, this pretty much proves maxims credability
http://gawker.com/359843/maxim-reviews-black-crowes-album-without-listening-to-it
Dan @ Jan 20th 2009 3:03PM
Although they are playstation magazines, they are indeed credible. They are very harsh with PS3 exclusives, just like the 360 mags. I guess they can't release reviews from top reviewers like Gametrailers, IGN, and Gamepro yet.
GregA @ Jan 21st 2009 11:01AM
ryuk,
Stale thread, so you probably wont ever get to read this, but it looks to me, that their review of Black Crows was right on.
http://www.metacritic.com/music/artists/blackcrowes/warpaint?q=black%20crows
Edge @ Jan 20th 2009 3:06PM
"The PS3 needs a good game, and this might as well be it."
See, when you read a mag that has little to do with gaming, you are more immune to statements like that. I'm inclined to think that KZ2 isn't as good as some people "know" it will be, and BitS is better than we think it will be.
ryuk @ Jan 20th 2009 3:13PM
wtf are you talking about PS3 needs a good game? it has plenty of great games, you may have been able to say it doesn't have any good games in '06 and early '07, but now that's just not true
memil @ Jan 20th 2009 3:13PM
KZ2 is probably good but I'm fed up with the PS3 fanboys' nagging. Everything that may shut them up is welcome
avan @ Jan 20th 2009 3:21PM
kz2 3.5 why im not surprised.